Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Psycho T's Pacers get silly



Sportynation, it has been far too long. I've gotten so busy with work that I have neglected the blog. For that, I am sorry.

Currently, something insane is happening...

The Indiana Pacers are 16-of-16 from field in 3rd quarters and up by 28 pts. Six of those shots are 3-pointers

And now, 4 mins later they are 20 of 20 from the field in the 3rd quater. They're up by 39 now.

The Indiana Pacers just had 54 points in the 3rd quarter while shooting 20-21 from the field. This is without question one of the oddest things ever for two reasons. #1 the Pacers are not good. Infact, they should finish somewhere at the bottom of the Eastern Conference standings. #2, the Nuggets seem actually be good. Sure, it's early, but they have been a playoff team for years now and still have one of the top 10 players in the game and on the court in a league where you play 5 players at one time. So that is a bad bad bad team beating a good team by 39 points while shooting 20-21 from the field (95%). Sportynation, this couldn't happen in a videogame. If you were to get on the sticks and start playing NBA2k11 and someone where to make 10 shots in a row while taking outside shots, you'd think something fishy was going on. If 20 consecutive shots were made, you'd shatter the controller, break a window, and maybe put a whole in the tv. This just doesn't happen.

Sportynation, sorry for being gone for so long. I am more or less back. More frequent posts are imminent. Take care. This is a mini-Minority Report.

Saturday, September 4, 2010

When bad gets worserer

"Everyone rises to their level of incompetence." -Laurence J. Peter

“Success builds character, failure reveals it"-Dave Checkett


“Success is never final; failure is never fatal” -unknown

Sportynation, look I'll be the first one to tell you that we shouldn't criticize "children," but geez. C'mon. Sometimes, you've got to call it like it is and sometimes is incomprehensibly silly, outrageously, mind-bogglingly dumb and asinine.

To further understand the incomprehensible, please see below. The first video, one can empathize, sympathize, and understand logically how "the play" can happen (nonetheless, it remains silly), but the second video is something that is inexplicable and something that can, will, and should stick with you. 


Enjoy, review, and comment. Gotta know what you think...


This is my mini-Minority Repoty!






And now the big kahuna.

Sunday, August 22, 2010

Jay Marrioti's "credibility"

Early Saturday morning in Los Angeles, Jay Mariotti was arrested for felony domestic assault after police found his girlfriend with “cuts and bruises“ following an alleged altercation between the two. After spending the night in jail, Mariotti was released on $50,000 bail and ordered to appear in court on Sept. 17.

Sportynation, this is Eliot Spitzer-esque. Granted Spitzer was an elected official and was instrumental in laws and actually affected people's lives in a real way, but talking heads and pundits like Marrioti whom routinely beat the athlete's that they cover to an absolute pulp are awful.

Marrioti is getting killed on blogs, twitter, and the such, but that's about it (so far atleast.) No one in the real media has dared to criticize. Zero chance ESPN says anything about its own and I wouldn't expect them to do that. I do, however, believe that ESPN being critical of itself and its own people would strengthen its credibility as a news entity and would begin to minimize the great hate and backlash. That being said, this media giant does whatever it wants and will continue to be on to for the foreseeable future. Nvm, "There's a sucker born every minute." Suckers don't challenge things.

I've never believed it to be exciting or fulfilling to see the downfall of someone and Marrioti deserves the benefit of the doubt even though he refuses to get it to anyone that isn't his friend or family, but this thing is eye-opening. I'm wanting to say it's a good thing, but can't find myself saying that.  Is Rick Reilly next? Skip Bayless perhaps? Moral police should be careful. We are human and with flaws and should not lose perspective. There is a thin thin line separating "us" from "them" and a short transition to "we".

Finally, just a week before Marrioti was arrested for felony domestic assault, Mariotti wrote - in a column for AOL Fanhouse - of recent punishment meted out by MLB in response to violent conduct by league players.

Below is a detailed account of many of Marrioti's views JUST on the abhorrent crime of domestic abuse (not his personal attacks on people he has never met or had brief contact. See Ricky Williams). For his sake, I hope he is innocent, but at this point I'm not sure it matters.



COURTESY OF SBS

The arrest follows a period of 15 years in which Mariotti, in his formerly regular CHICAGO SUN-TIMES column, harshly criticized athletes for their involvement in domestic violence against their girlfriends and wives.

In a Sun-Times piece dated January 3, 1996, and titled, “Nebraska’s Title Tainted by Phillips’ Participation,” Mariotti wrote that Nebraska’s ‘96 NCAA college football championship was “tainted” because of a misdemeanor domestic assault charge against then-Cornhuskers star Lawrence Phillips. Excerpt:
Dr. Tom would like his program stamped as a dynasty today, the first team to repeat as unanimous national champions in 40 years, the team that dented history and deflated Steve Spurrier’s little-boy ego on the same night.
Sorry.
The 62-24 thrashing of Florida was only a footnote to a deplorable sight in the (Ad Space Here) Fiesta Bowl. That vision would be Lawrence Phillips, running free in the desert, galloping for 165 yards and three scores and playing the hero’s role. Assuredly, this fellow is no hero. At a time when domestic violence never has been a more pressing issue - and largely involves the sporting genre - Phillips begins the new year as a horrid symbol of why the problem still isn’t taken seriously enough.
Pummel the girl, play in the big game, do your touchdown moonwalk, revive your pro career. Afterward, say, “I knew we would wear them down. It feels good to be with my team and win another national championship.” What a fine statement for young America.
Of Phillips Mariotti wrote:
If we can give Phillips some credit for facing the national media and our questions, we give him little credit for his answers. Osborne’s few backers in this case will say he is trying to save a kid’s life. But why, when other societal offenders must pay penance, should Phillips get such a huge break?


On July 21, 1998, Mariotti assailed the Chicago White Sox for signing Albert Belle in part because of a pending domestic violence charge against Belle that involved abusing the ballplayer’s girlfriend at the time. Excerpt:
Fifty-five million dollars. How many hungry children could be fed for $55 million? How many lousy roads could be fixed for $55 million? How many air conditioners could be installed in sweltering city apartments for $55 million? How many schools could be renovated for $55 million?
The White Sox spent $55 million on Albert Belle. Never has it seemed a more tragic waste of money than today. Where has this grand investment taken them? How has it benefited the team’s sagging relationship with the community? They’ve been a lame club since he arrived. Only recently has he begun to produce like a big-time power hitter. He has been a colossal jerk in the clubhouse, anathema to Sox fans who tried to like him but gave up.
And now, we have the first Chicago-related allegation that he has become what his surly reputation suggested.
A menace to society.
With a convicted wife-beater playing first base and enough public-relations problems to threaten their extinction, the last thing the Sox needed was an off-the-field incident involving Belle. Now they have that albatross, too, after the temperamental, ever-troubled slugger allegedly punched a 25-year-old woman in the back, twisted her arm, knocked her to the floor and ripped a telephone cord out of the wall as she attempted to call 911 for help. When she tried to rise, assistant state’s attorney David Coleman said, Belle pushed her back down.
Sends shivers up your spine, doesn’t it?


The Belle signing followed the White Sox’s decision to sign Wilfredo Cordero, who was also cited in the past for domestic violence against his partner, which Mariotti noted:
He and Reinsdorf better be careful. It is one thing to give Wil Cordero a final chance after his history of domestic abuse. But to have two players with the same problem, if the Belle allegations prove true, would be devastating to a franchise that has hit rock bottom in credibility. The nerve of Reinsdorf to keep using two gimmicks to bring in fans.
Earlier, on April 9, 1998, Mariotti had written of Cordero in the Sun-Times:
The public has it all wrong, Wil Cordero said. He is not the man we think he is. “They make it seem like I’m the kind of guy who will go home after the game and beat my wife,” he said. “But that’s not who I am. That’s not the kind of person I am.”
No? Then who was the person who admitted to beating his wife last June in Boston? The person who, police say, left dried blood on his wife’s nose and red marks on her throat and arms? The person who allegedly threatened to kill her as the authorities hauled him away? The person who pleaded guilty to four charges, including felony assault and battery with a dangerous weapon?
It was you, Wilfredo Cordero. In a matter of days, he will be heading to Chicago, eager to deliver timely hits and play first base for the White Sox. And accompanying Cordero will be the woman he hit, Ana Echevarria, who is trying to rebuild their marriage after the frightening episode of domestic abuse and allegations of other incidents.
Suddenly, a baseball franchise already battling apathy and disarray now has saddled its community with a serious social issue: whether an admitted wife beater, who has been accused by two other women of abusing them, can avoid problems this year in a local residence that also will include the couple’s newborn son.
He will arrive before month’s end. A bad idea is about to happen.

 
Still earlier, on March 24, 1998, Mariotti wrote of Cordero:
Welcome to Chicago, city of no conscience. Welcome to Chicago, where an admitted wife-beater can become an instant hero by wrapping those same fists around a fastball. Once upon a time, we were best known for pizza, architecture, Michael Jordan, nightlife, neighborhoods, TV skits, a big lake.
Not anymore. Today, we are known as the halfway house for wayward, troubled athletes with horrible tempers and wicked manners. Give us your domestic abusers, your trick-or-treat attackers, your head-butters, your drug-users, your ref-terrorists, your bat- corkers, your groin-kickers, your spectator-punchers, your .44 Magnum-carriers.
The civic track record is why Jerry Reinsdorf can pursue a proven menace like Wil Cordero, regretfully signed Monday by the White Sox, when owners in other towns are too dignified and respectful of the citizenry to try. You might think it’s a coy sort of forgiveness, taking problematic athletes into your bosom and dealing with Dennis Rodman and Albert Belle, Tony Phillips and Bryan Cox, Pippen and Bob Probert and, in a sadder sense, Alonzo Spellman.
I call it crude ignorance, frightening shallow-mindedness, a peculiar permissiveness that has been allowed to hit rock-bottom.
A trend is now a full-blown epidemic with fangs. The aforementioned problem children are mostly saints compared to Cordero, who pleaded guilty in November to charges of assaulting and threatening his wife, Ana, in a June disturbance that left her nose a bloody mess.
Two days later, March 26, 1998, Mariotti wrote of the Bears contemplating the drafting of Randy Moss:
The timing of Wil Cordero couldn’t be worse. Randy Moss knows. He has been trying, with a precise public-relations plan, to convince Chicago he won’t be a menace to society if the Bears draft him. You know, that he has matured since allegedly striking the mother of his daughter, stomping a student in a race-related brawl, smoking pot and serving 93 days in jail.
But now comes the outrageously irresponsible signing of Cordero, an admitted wife-beater who joins the White Sox today. And with it comes the reality that the Bears, already riding the morality fence on Moss, cannot choose him with the fifth selection of the first round without a horrific outcry.
Then there’s what Mariotti wrote of Moss and the fans of Chicago on Dec. 23, 1997:
Or a wickedly talented gamebreaker (Moss), possibly of Jerry Rice’s caliber, who served jail time for kicking a kid to smithereens, got bounced out of Notre Dame, violated his probation by smoking pot, did the near-impossible and got bounced out of Florida State, claims to truly hate people, assures “the hate’s always going to be there,” was charged with domestic battery against the mother of his baby daughter and donned wraparound shades for a stately Heisman Trophy ceremony watched by millions?
We know what the fans want. Evil. Always willing to compromise ethics for the thrill of victory, always ready to grant clemency to anyone who can help Chicago win a game, the people want the problem child. 


On Dec. 6, 2005, Mariotti noted of Milton Bradley and the Cubs:
A destination? Truth be told, the North Side has become a place of desperation. Why else would an embarrassed Hendry and a dazed Dusty Baker shift their anxious sights to the troubled Milton Bradley, not exactly Tribune Co.’s next Employee of the Month?
(Bradley) reportedly had his home visited three times last summer by police investigating domestic-violence claims, one in which Bradley allegedly choked his pregnant wife, bloodied her lip and threw a cell phone against a wall, though no charges were filed against him or his wife. 
Of Corey Dillon, Mariotti wrote on Sept. 7, 2000:
The best college back is Deuce McAllister of Mississippi, a two-way performer who would be a sweet fit, but he’ll be long gone before the Bears’ usual middle-of-the-road pick. Dillon could be the prize of free agency, but not if he is reprimanded by the commissioner’s office in an ongoing domestic-violence case.
 On June 19, 1994, Mariotti wrote of O.J. Simpson:
What about his no-contest plea to a wife-beating charge a few years ago? Alas, answers won’t be known until the trial, if then. O.J. Simpson should not be convicted or acquitted before then, no matter what is reported or said. Remember, this is America.
What made it crazier yet was Simpson’s reputation as a well-adjusted, down-to-earth celebrity. Other than the wife-beating charges, which may have been absurdly downplayed in the media because of his popularity, you rarely heard bad stuff about Simpson. 
On the occasion of Scottie Pippen being selected to the U.S. Olympic Team, Mariotti wrote on July 31, 1995:
Never mind the message his selection sends to young hoop players: Toss a chair, quit with 1.8 seconds left, still make the Dream Team. Never mind what it says to society: Keep a loaded gun in your Range Rover, pile up police reports involving domestic abuse, call Chicago fans racists, still make the Dream Team. All the corporate suits know is, he can go coast-to-coast and jam better than anyone else out there. Make sure he’s in Atlanta, they demand.
Pippen is on the edge of 30. One of these years, you hope he grows up. Yet the last we saw him, not long before an assault charge was dropped by his now-former fiancee, he was speeding far above the limit on Lake Shore Drive, top down, shirt off. Hopefully, one of his current representatives will have a heart-to-heart with him before Atlanta. You know, don’t shame the country.


On May 9, 2003, Mariotti passionately defended Bob Ryan after the Boston sportswriter said he’d like to “smack” the wife of Jason Kidd - and then refused to immediately apologize. Excerpt:
Breaking one of my cardinal rules, I’ve been reading the Internet the last few days and have been astonished at some of the opinions.
But of Kidd, Mariotti wrote on June 5, 2002:
A domestic abuser is not a hero in any arena. When a group of crude, drunken fans in Boston taunted him with chants of “Wife Beater! Wife Beater!” last week, I felt bad that Kidd’s wife, Joumana, and the couple’s 3-year-old son, T.J., had to endure such courtside harassment. Victims of violence shouldn’t be subjected to cruel reminders. 
That said, did I feel bad for Kidd?
Not really.
This is the baggage he inherited, the scrutiny that never will fade.


Finally, just a week before he was arrested for felony domestic assault, Mariotti wrote - in a column for AOL Fanhouse - of recent punishment meted out by MLB in response to violent conduct by league players.

The piece was headlined: “For Acts of Violence, MLB Much Too Soft.”
Would it be unreasonable to suggest that with the aforementioned body of work, Mariotti’s credibility in criticizing athletes for violent conduct of any sort has been permanently impugned?

Sunday, August 15, 2010

Suicide Watch

“Suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem.”-Donahue

“I just couldn’t live with myself knowing I had just killed myself.”-?

“Why kill yourself? Life will do it for you.”-?

“Suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem.”-Donahue

“Life is like a movie, if you've sat through more than half of it and its sucked every second so far, it probably isn't gonna get great right at the end and make it all worthwhile. None should blame you for walking out early.”-Stanhope

Dustin Johnson goes on suicide watch for a "tuck-rule-esque" golf abomination/rule.


 



Dustin Johnson went from a put to Par and win the tournament to a double bogey and missing out on the playoff because he grounded the ball in a "bunker." The thing is the "bunker" wasn't a "bunker" I mean is a bunker a bunker if 125 people & camera guys stand in it?

Official USGA on bunkers...

13-4. Ball in Hazard; Prohibited Actions:

Except as provided in the Rules, before making a stroke at a ball that is in a hazard (whether a bunker or a water hazard) or that, having been lifted from a hazard, may be dropped or placed in the hazard, the player must not:
a. Test the condition of the hazard or any similar hazard;
b. Touch the ground in the hazard or water in the water hazard with his hand or a club; or
c. Touch or move a loose impediment lying in or touching the hazard.


The worse thing about this is that he probably would not have been assessed the penalty had it happened on Thursday or Friday and this lack of inconsistency is troubling. If Johnson had the same situation take place on his third hole of the second round, chances are no cameras would have picked it up and/or cared, so Johnson would have unknowingly kept going without assessing himself a stroke.


Later on CBS...
"I don't know if I can describe it. ... It never once crossed my mind that I was in a sand trap. ... The only thing worse could be if I had made that putt. ... I just thought I was on a piece of dirt that the crowd had trampled down. ... Obviously, I know the rules of golf. I can't ground my club in a bunker." 

"I don't know if I can describe it. ... It never once crossed my mind that I was in a sand trap. ... The only thing worse could be if I had made that putt. ... I just thought I was on a piece of dirt that the crowd had trampled down. ... Obviously, I know the rules of golf. I can't ground my club in a bunker."  

"If it was up to me, I wouldn't have thought I was in a bunker, but it's not up to me." 

Jason Sobel summed things up nicely below...

It's a bunker. He grounded his club. Should be a penalty.

The fact that there's an inconsistency between players all week never having such a ruling reviewed and Dustin Johnson having his reviewed by officials only because he was leading on the final hole is completely bogus.

If golf's organizations want to go to television replays, they need to set up cameras on every single hole of every course and review every shot afterward. Of course that shouldn't happen, but why should one player be penalized only because of bad timing for his mistimed mishap.
 

Please please please somebody go home with Dustin Johnson and under no circumstance is he to be left alone not even to use the restroom. Give him days and time to cool off (not alone) and absolutely no sharp objects.  

Do you and or we care who wins now? Probably, but you can't be faulted for not caring. Undoubtedly more drama will ensue, but it can't top what has already happened. 
 
This is my Minority Report.  

Friday, July 30, 2010

So that just happened...

Just got back from a brisk 5K in my brand spankin' new shoes. Was a minute faster than two days ago in my brutally destroyed old shoes, I turned on the MacBook Pro, went to ESPN, and saw "it". I then, stood up and starred out the window for about 45 seconds as if I were watching a snake mate with a bird. Quickly, a slightly menical-smirk came over my face and I realized the world we are living in is beyond crazy.

Sportynation, ladies and gentleman there is a page on ESPN designed specifically to chronicle Tim Tebow's "career." It is called "Tebow Watch"

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/feature/index?page=TebowWatch



Remember the days when ESPN had an NBA running free agency clock 3 months ago? And then, when July 1st happened nothing happened? People stood around and looked at each other like "so what do we do" Eventually, something happened "it" in this case was LeBron. ESPN, ultimately, lost with that "it." However, now ESPN is back to its money maker: Tim Tebow.

Sportynation, manufactured storylines are back back back. The NFL is back.

Be easy, sportynation. This is my Minority Report.

Disclaimer: I experienced a great deal of cognitive dissonance in this post. That is to say, I am writing about something that I find utterly ridiculous, "Tebow Watch" and am also attaching a link. O my. Shower, red wine, burger in no particular order here I come!

Thursday, July 29, 2010

Contrarian Prokhorov

To whom this may concern:

The players are signed, the "Decision" is made, but the passions around this year's extraordinary class of NBA free agents refuses to die down. What surprises me is the amount of negative commentary directed at the three top free agents (especially LeBron James) who decided to play on the same team and to create a great franchise together. Of course, any club owner dreams of having those players, including me, but all questions of how the announcements were made aside, I respect their choice, and no one has the right to judge them.
 
I want to say that I support LeBron, the best athlete in the NBA. He had a truly difficult choice to make. Any move he made was sure to be viewed as wrong, and to leave many unhappy fans. Basing his decision on achieving results on the basketball court shows that the sportsman won the day, not the showman or the businessman. What is wrong with that?
We are seeing the birth of a new, dynamic team with such star players, and all of us can await the new season with great anticipation. I wish them success and give them my moral support. I will be happy for us to beat the Miami Heat in the conference finals, maybe not this season, but in the very near future.

Mikhail Prokhorov; Moscow

Saturday, July 3, 2010

Summer 2010 NBA FA




Free Agency
July 1st 12:01am the first day of NBA free agency. A free agent (FA) is a player whose contract with a team has expired and who is thus eligible to sign with another club or franchise.

A trio of star players Chris Bosh, LeBron James, and Dwayne Wade lead the summer 2010 FA class and signed deals that would allow them to be FAs at the same time  instead of staggered. That coupled with players such as Amar'e Stoudemire and Dirk Nowitski opting out of their contracts makes an already typical free agent summer that much more ridiculous.

Due to the structure of the NBA and the savy players' contracts, the athlete has become, perhaps, more powerful than the billionaire owners. That is to say, the athlete can tell the owner what he wants, where he'll play, who he will play with, how much money he wants and needs, and who he wants his coach to be. In addition to that a city, organization(s), and governments backing/offering so much for a signature and agreement to join their favorite NBA team.

Financial implications
It has often been mentioned that LeBron James can re-sign for six years and $125.5 million with the Cavaliers, but the max deal he could get from another team would be five years and $96.1 million. Here's the year-by-year breakdown.

Comparing Max Deals

Year Sign with own team Sign with other team Difference
2010-11 $16,568,908 $16,568,908 0
2011-12 $18,308,643 $17,894,421 $414,222
2012-13 $20,048,378 $19,219,934 $828,444
2013-14 $21,788,113 $20,545,447 $1,242,666
2014-15 $23,527,848 $21,870,960 $1,656,888
2015-16 $25,267,583 -- $25,267,583
Contract total $125,509,473 $96,099,670 $29,409,803


These differences are attributable to the fact that a player's own team can offer 10.5 percent raises every season, while other teams can offer just 8.0 percent raises (in addition to the fact that a player's own team can offer a sixth season).

Perception/fairness
"You've got to love all these NBA owners and execs begging players to do something that they themselves have never done: Take less money."-Adrian Wojnarowski

Indeed, the players have almost all the power and control, but we cannot forget about the implications of the media and people within the NBA organizations. The media has been disseminating unsubstantiated reports for many months now trying to get the scoop and NB teams have been leaking tidbits consistently to increase their chances of acquiring a FA, but more importantly pre-emptive damage control. There are more teams than there are stud players. 


As it happens ...

WojYahooNBA: Knicks owner Jim Dolan called Jay-Z and complained massive Nets mural overlooking MSG was "intimidating his employees," Nets sources say.

RT @PDcavsinsider: Knicks just sent over their luggage/computers for presentation with an advance team. Folks, I can't make this stuff up.

sportsguy33: "Hey Joe Johnson - thanks for leading us to that 4-game 2nd round sweep when we lost by 20+ per game. Here's $119 million."

LeBatardShow: I know this is impatience talking but we we gathered for a 12:01 circus, dammit, and under the tent is just a sad reindeer and drew gooden

sportsguy33: Joe Johnson in Magic sweep w/ Vince/Barnes/Pietrus defending him: 12.8 PPG, 30% FG, 9-39 3FG, 19 FTA. His team quit by Game 3. $119 million?

sportsguy33: Like BP shored up the oil leak. RT @chadfordinsider: Wolves spent $33 million on Darko and Pekovic to shore up their middle.

LeBatardShow: There's a dirty, emaciated wolf under this lame circus tent and look over there! A clown gm and darko sitting atop 20 million! Party!

LeBatardShow: Minnesota giving darko 20 mil is worst basketball idea since kenyon martin tattoed a rapper's lips to his neck


WojYahooNBA: Channing Frye considering Suns 5-year, $25 million offer, and waiting on the likes of Chicago and New York to have resolution on big stars.

WojYahooNBA: As Y! reported late Wednesday night, Bucks and John Salmons progressing toward contract agreement. Deal likely worth $40 mlll., source says.


LeBatardShow: When Riley arrived at lebrons, did he ask spoelstra to wait in the car?

LeBatardShow: Jay-z has 99 problems and his pitch ain't one. But Russian mafioso owns 99 percent of team. So jay-z has 99 problems and his percentage is

LeBatardShow: Tom Thibodeau, who has never been a head coach in the NBA is 2 signatures away from becoming the greatest head coach in NBA history 

This is my Minority Report!

  

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Bye bye Mr. Rah-Sheed

For all the people that hate millionaire spoiled lacking perspective athletes Rasheed Wallace has done the unthinkable. He has shown personal pride and will walk away from the final two years and $13 million remaining on his contract and conclude a 15-year career. He is leaving guaranteed money.

Sportynation, how many of you would say, "I know I am owed 13 million dollars over the next two years, but I am going to walk away from that. I have too much dignity and personal pride to do something not well or without my full heart.

This is further proof that, indeed, the rich and famous are not too far different from us regular folks.

This is my Minority Report. Have a good one Sheed. "Both teams played hard"-Rasheed Wallace

Pay the man.

Seemingly soon to be millionaire, Wesley Johnson from Syracuse University was selected 4th by the Minnesota Timberwolves. He is wearing pajamas not unlike the ones pictured below. Give the man an advance. Start his per diem early. Geez. What a shame.  (juxtaposed picture coming).



NBA draft night Minority Report.

Why Paul Allen is only worth ≈ 13billion



Paul Allen is an American industrialist and philanthropist who co-founded Microsoft with Bill Gates and is one of the wealthiest people in the world with a personal wealth of US$13.5 billion as of 2010 and is clearly not the nicest most empathetic person in the world.

Paul Allen fired  GM Kevin Pritchard on draft night. The story broke just minutes before John Wall was drafted by the Washington Wizards. Curious. No? Pritchard will handle drafting duties tonight and then pack his bags for Paul Allen. He's thought of as a top NBA GM and should have no trouble finding another job.

Sportynation, this is worse than getting fired on Christmas eve.  This is more like getting fired the day before an IPO or the day before the Olympics. It's wild. This is awful. You'd think that Allen would have known this before today. No? There are only a very very few reasonable things that should occur at the 25th hour such as Pritchard commiting a crime or something taudry such as sleeping with Allen's wife, mother, daughter, or son. I'm just sayin'.

I leave you with this....who wants to work for Mr. Allen? Whoooooooo? I sure don't. Whataguy.

This is my mini Minority Report.

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Why to root against the Celts...



Ten excuses Celtics fans will use if they lose to the Lakers 

Courtesy of Matthew Berry

1. Kobe got all the calls. And his fingers weren't hurt enough. Or his toes. I don't know. Kobe sucks.

2. Rondo was banged up, and everyone knows you can't win a championship with three future Hall of Famers if your fourth-year point guard has muscle spasms.

3. The Lakers stole Gasol! Rip-off trades should only happen when a beloved former power forward becomes the GM of another team.

4. Bill Simmons jinxed us.

5. The tech/ejection/suspension on Rasheed/ KG/Perkins is because the refs are out to get them, not because they're crazy and/or jerks who have complained about every call ever. (Not gonna lie -- Artest doesn't do well in this category either. But at least we only got one crazy).


6. If we aren't going to get a 38-to-10 free throw advantage like we did in Game 2 of 2008, how does anyone ever expect us to win?

7. Wait, they're still playing? I jumped off the bandwagon last year. OK, I'm back! I never bailed! Celtics forever! What? They lost? Why does this always happen to me? (This is the best and probably the most accurate one.) Of all the bandwagon fans out there, Boston has the most. See Pats, Red Sox, and Celts. The tried to do it with the Bruins, but they lost...maybe next year.

8. Fisher is a dirty player. That's KG's move!

9. Gasol flops too much. That's KG's move!

10. Pierce got confused on which injury to fake.

The last round I rooted against the Lakers and for Amar'e and Nash, but this series I absolutely have to root against the always talking, front running Celtics. Doc Rivers, Tom Thibodeau, a few other coaches, and maybe the pure shooting Ray Ray are fine by me...all the others not so much.

Rooting for the mamba. Oh the world we live in. Talk to you all soon.

This is my Minority Report

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

The perfect game that wasn't



Armando Galarraga, not the big Kat Andres, of the Detroit Tigers came within one out -- and maybe one inch -or less -- of the third perfect game in the major leagues this season.

The 28-year-old right-hander from Venezuela, making his third start of the season, beat the Cleveland Indians 3-0 and lost the bid when first base umpire Jim Joyce ruled Jason Donald safe for an infield hit as he crossed the first-base bag as Galarraga was receiving a throw from first baseman Miguel Cabrera, who had fielded Donald's grounder.

Look, I'll be the first one to argue the importance of consistency of calls, but you have to kinda lean towards the guy working towards the perfect game particularly on an infield single which at worse was arguable.

Jim Joyce just made an imperfect call to ruin a perfect game. Galarraga will not be remembered for his gem and what was rightfully his place in history. He is more than likely never get this moment again. In the moment, Galarraga reacted merely with a laugh. I applaud him. MDK could have occured. See "Demolition Man" for the reference. 

That being said, Jim Joyce is a dead man walking. He could be worse than Steve Bartman and Kirk Gibson.

Sportynation, like the GOP, Sarah Palin, and tea partiers. I'll say "don't be violent, but fight for what you want and believe in."

Gun to my head, gun to my head, if I woke up in the morning with some crazy news about Mr. Jim Joyce it would be the least surprising thing ever. I mean ever. Crazy news like Marshal Mathers, Kid Rock, Jim Leyland, the auto industry, James Carville, Sarah Palin, and ME joining forces together to torture and waterboard, I would not be surprised. Yes, I threw myself in there.

Sportynation, instant replay is coming. The pundits will be out in full force. Unreasonable conclusions will be made, and it's going to be one of the more entertaining things of the summer and quite possibly the year. Hyperbole this is not. 

Welcome instant replay!

No soapbox or high horse. Man, that was crazy! Largest impact of the summer?

We almost just had 3 perfect games in ONE MONTH threw maybe 25% of a 182 game season. 20 in history.

Before I forget, Griffey Jr retired an hour and a half ago. He retired on the wrong night.

Detroit just could be the saddest most unluckiest city in the U.S. Forget could be, it is. 

This is my Minority Report. My take, my opinion, nothing regurgitated, before we are told what to believe or think.

Monday, May 31, 2010

The case for Ron Ron

 


I was watching game 5 of the Lakers/Suns western conference final in my NYC rent stabilized apartment which was an already über interesting game with when it happened...Ron Artest shot a 3 pointer instead of holding on to the ball and "milking" the clock. At the moment it happened as well as today I can't say whether or not the shot was wise, warranted, incorrect, or whatever, but I can say that the immediate visceral reaction was far too much. Bill Simmons tweeted out "Ron Artest!" over and over repeatedly to strengthen his already made up mind on Ron Artest. The commentators screamed about how awful the shot was, and Phil Jackson barked at Ron on the timeout (Jackson being upset is significantly more reasonable because he is the coach and conceivably could have given orders to not take the shot and approach the situation/circumstance a particular way had it presented itself). However, Jackson unquestionably did not remove him from the game. After all, he still has value despite his widely accepted "knuckle headed" decision.



Henry Abbot and his True Hoop blog were discovered by me about a month ago. I heard about it and read it randomly and infrequently, but not regularly and certainly not as intently as I now wish I had. He clearly laid out some of the things that I was thinking such as what if Artest had made the 3 as well as the truly infuriating assumption that not shooting the 3 would result in a win or a significantly higher chance of winning while not taking into account the million potential outcomes. Henry Abbot delved further into this and eloquently elaborated further below. I used most of his framework and descriptions below and added commentary below...


With about a minute left in Game 5 of the Western Conference finals Pau Gasol chased down an offensive rebound in the corner.

Steve Nash is loaded with veteran tricks. Gasol had his back turned. Nash resolved to get a steal by sneaking up behind to poke it away. It almost worked! But at the last instant, Gasol saw the approaching Canadian and whipped a pass to Ron Artest, who was just about to ignite a hailstorm of criticism.

Nash was now horribly out of position, still in the corner. Three Lakers -- Artest, Derek Fisher and Kobe Bryant -- were spread across the arc of the 3-point line, and every single one of them about as open as NBA players ever get.

Without a lot of analysis, the general thought is to burn clock in this situation. The Lakers have the lead, and would be smart to limit the number of times the Suns get the ball to try to change that.

But under no circumstances were the Lakers going to get an easier scoring opportunity over the remaining seconds of the game than this moment, and they were certain to need a bucket or two before the final buzzer to win.

Three NBA players empowered by their coaches to shoots 3s. No defense. You don't have to be an idiot to consider pulling that trigger. And this regular season Artest, believe it or not, was the best 3-point shooter of those three. He made 36% of his shots from downtown, compared to Fisher's 35% and Bryant's 33%.

So he shot it. The non progressive anti-statistics driven people unwilling to accept new information and adapt will disregard the statistics and point to situational statistics and intangibles which under no circumstance can be quantified, proven, or rationally argued.

Commentators were uniformly dumbfounded. Even though Artest would later win the game with an amazing and heroic play, this shot overshadowed all as the big topic of his post-game interview.

His poor judgment features prominently in all kinds of game coverage. Which seems a little unfair, for (three) reasons:

There are a thousand sins worse than taking a wide open jumper.
If anyone hurt his team with poor judgment on that play, you'd have to at least consider the possibility it may have been the out-of-position Nash. Artest had a 36% chance at making that shot. What chance did Nash have at getting the steal, 5%? Next, is a double teamed fading away from the basket tight to the baseline 23+ feet away from the basket a quality shot? Indeed, Kobe is the best player and you want him to take the final shot, but at what costs? Are all shots (both guarded, unguarded and varying distances) equal?



You can't prove burning clock leads to more wins.
That's the accepted dogma, but a lot of accepted dogma is wrong. How many truly wide open shots does an NBA team get in the playoffs? Can you afford to pass up any of them? I'm not saying I know the answer, but I am saying that there is way more tradition than evidence at work. What if a Nick Anderson situation emerges (clank clank!) a turnover, a poor decision, or a good defensive play, or merely a missed shot? All of which are significant reasonable outcomes.


Are they criticizing the decision to shoot, or the miss?
Shot selection is about decision-making before the shot goes up -- not whether it happens to come down in the basket or not. This player, that spot, these teammates, those defenders, that game plan, that many seconds on the clock ... that's what matters in judging if the decision to shoot was good or not.

But we the fans and the media have a sloppy habit in talking about shot selection, which is that if the ball happens to go in, it gets a free pass. (Find me examples of experts criticizing players for poor shot selection after makes. It's not easy.)

If Artest's shot had gone in, today the world would be praising his poise and killer instinct in icing the game, not unlike the adulation Northern Iowa's Ali Farokhmanesh received in this year's NCAA tournament for a similar decision. That's the shot Artest thought he was taking. And if it had gone in, everybody would have seen it his way. It's the argument of ballsy and gutsy v. dumb and undisciplined.

Farokhmanesh would have more than likely been called sophomoric, inexperienced, not ready for the big stage, the quintessential mid major player that lacks the big time intangibles, sensibilities, and etc. within Big East and ACC players.

Sportynation, it's about playing the result and not the action at the moment. It's about being fair and trying or at least pretending to be consistent. It's about not looking for information to strengthen our already established beliefs while discounting all other information.


This is my Minority Report.

Saturday, May 29, 2010

Down goes Morales down goes Morales!

Los Angeles Angels first baseman Kendy Morales appeared to seriously seriously injure his left leg after hitting the game-winning grand slam in the 10th inning of the Angels' 5-1 win over the Seattle Mariners Saturday.

Morales was leaping in the air, surrounded by his teammates, when he appeared to land on someone's foot. He collapsed and remained on top of home plate for several several minutes, the Angels clustered around him. Joy quickly turned to sadness, bewilderment, and unease. Trainers administered an air cast to Morales' left foot and he was placed on a stretcher and carted off the field.



Geez Louise. Funny, not funny, or both? I say funny as all get out.

5/29/2010 9:12pm Morale is confirmed to have a broken ankle. Oh my. 

Monday, May 17, 2010

The quintessential NFL analyst

Reason #1.2359801 that the NFL draft is dreck.

Famous Mel Kiper quote from before a draft.

Blank is going to immediately energize that fanbase, that football team on the practice field, in the locker room. Three years from now you could be looking at a guy that’s certainly one of the elite top 5 quarterbacks in this league. You’re talking about a 2-3 year period once he is under center. Look out because the skill level that he has is certainly John Elway-like.”

Blank is JaMarcus Russell. He has been called the worst #1 pick in the history of professional sports.

Mel Kiper is an “expert that the typical NFL sports guy worships with every ounce of his being. Kiper’s word is gold and SHOULD go unquestioned. His “facts” or rather opinions are spewed to the masses and never checked. They aren’t checked because the typical sports guy does not think or say I don’t know. The typical sports guy looks at the glitter in primetime ofcourse, says ok, then regurgitates what he/she heard on tv sans insight and perspective of course. After all it’s easy and reasonable to repeat what an “expert” says. No?

Made for TV by TV is the NFL draft. Enjoy it at your own peril.

Gregg Rosenthal of NBC and Pro Football Talk said it nicely, today, after the noteworthy NFL Matchup show was speculated to be leaving the airwaves…

“The rest of the morning programs seem programed for high schoolers that like WWE-style manufactured storylines, forced laughter, meaningless debates, soft features, and very little football. You rarely learn anything.”

Sportynation, I am sad. It’s a shame “thinking” doesn’t sell. This is my Minority Report.

Saturday, May 8, 2010

Friday, April 23, 2010

The NFL Draft is dumb...

Reason #700-#704 why the NFL Draft is absurd.

#700 No one knows how successful players will be, but act is if this is a video game strategy guide listing players' abilities. So, draft post draft grades and etc. are ridiculous.

#701 It's all misinformation. Teams have no reason or benefit to be honest and forthcoming.

#702 It's something that has been blown out of proportion for television purposes.

#703 It's lazy, speculative, consensus-building, nonsensical-babble where hindsight is 20-20 and the result is played too often.

#704 Media members comparing their draft boards to scout's and GM's boards.

SPortynation, I leave you with this. It is easy to criticize what someone else does whether or not it is music, investments, paintings, sculptures, and/or draft boards. But, when it is you, your sole decision and opportunity what would you do? Would your decision be better or just as good. What would your draft board look like sans outside influence. We are anchoring and adjusting to opinions. For example, Mel Kiper, a merely ok football analyst that is as mainstream as they come that reaches the masses because of his lazy declarations, easy stances, and monosyllabic tendencies states his point of view and then "we" as an audience adjust to what he says and base our opinions off of dribble.

Keep thinking. This is my Minority Report.

Monday, April 19, 2010

Wow Stat #2

The Washington Nationals as a team have more walks than strike outs. A relief pitcher leads the team in strikeouts! O my! O my! O my!

This is my my Minority Report factoid.

Wow Stat of the Day

On average, the Yankees' 2009 gate receipts for a seven-game home series were greater than the Pirates' gate receipts for the entire year.

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

The Worst Best Coach Ever

Sooo I woke up to reports that Doc Rivers may step down after the season. Ohh Snap, Sportynation! Here we go again. It seems Doc Rivers sucks yet again. Doc Rivers was the coach of the year in 2000 for the 41-41 Orlando Magic and was the leader of a fantastic World Championship 08-09 Boston Celtic team. (Disclaimer: Doc Rivers' departure has being framed as a departure on his own volition ala Stan VanGundy in Miami.)

"Things are not what the seem"-Disclosure 1994



The typical sports guy, which is certainly not limited to "us" regular folk and extends to people in the mainstream media, too often fall into the trap of mis-attributing outcomes and occurrences. To further illustrate and display some of the more egregious or rather noteworthy, Mike Brown '08-'09, Byron Scott '07-'08, Sam Mitchell '06-'07, Avery Johnson '05-'06, Mike D'Antoni '04-'05, and Hubie Brown '03-'04 won the last 6 Coach of the Year Awards. Not only do these coaches share this award, but also they have been straight up fired, not re-signed, let go, and/or called awful. 1 of the 6 last coaches of the year is still with the same team. And, the only coach that remains with the same team, Mike Brown, is widely accepted to be awful, unimaginative, and powerless.

Sportynation, I find it hard to believe that all of these coaches were absolutely fantastic and great and the best in world at what they do, coach, but a year or two later are terrible. There has to be more at play than than the easy/lazy attribution and overstatement of the coach's worth. I am of the camp that believes that players such Dirk Nowitzki, Steve Nash, Amare Stoudemire, LeBron James, Pau Gasol, Chris Bosh, and Chris Paul are more responsible for the team's ultimate success rather than the coach. Indeed, the coach has some importance, but that importance seems to be greatly overstated.



A real life example can be found in day to day business. Simplistically, juxtapose the leader with the absolute best employees in the world with the leader with the worst employees in the world. The leader with the best employees will more often than not be more successful.

Sportynation, all I am saying is that we shouldn't act in haste. We should think more and not automatically take the easy points of view and stances by default. Without a doubt, the leader is the dominant image of the team, company, but there are workers as well. Without workers, the leader is nothing particularly in a ridiculously highly specialized industry, professional sports, where the workers value/worth is amplified and tremendous, and the coach's value diminished. The workers are paid more than the coach or leader for a multitude of reasons that I will tangentially explore in a future post.

Sportynation, be smart, be different, and try something new. This is my Minority Report.

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Geno and his women...




Sportynation, I left work at 5 something today. Went to Harlem to get a haircut, chilled with my barbers, got my ears lowered, came back downtown, picked up a few groceries, came home, hung my clothes up, put some food in the oven, turned on the computer, and sat in amazement. My heart started racing from the pure euphoria that a child gets when he or she finally obtains that one thing that are ever so certain that under any circumstance that he or she can not live without.

The euphoria emerged from the Uconn Lady Huskies. Snap! So, it was 42-28 UConn at the half. Less than 10 minutes later the score was 72-38...less than 10 minutes later. 5 minutes later, the score was 80-40. My heart started to pump more and more. I would do little things like get a drink of water, use the restroom, sweep my room, watch and Idol performance just to see what could and would happen in such a short period of time. Geno (the head coach) and these ladies are going beast and making the usually unwatchable, women's basketball, watchable.

The Lady Huskies if successful tonight, will have 76 consecutive wins and will further increase there average margin of victory that is easily more than 37 points per game on average. This team is so stacked, loaded, dominant, and unbelievable that they have not had any single-digit victories during this run. They had a nail-biter earlier this year when they played and beat the yearlong #2 team Stanford Cardinal.

Sportynation, I am looking into Vegas sports books right now as I type this entry. I am looking for Uconn odds for any and everything. This team is like a money market account, a savings account, or owning an NFL team. It will always payback. You can't lose. Your return may not be large, but it's a return. Just do it like Nike.

This is my Minority Report! Whew let's let that heart calm down now. Geez...

Thursday, March 18, 2010

The Oprah Effect? Nah the Tiggah Effect!




The Oprah Effect on CNN move over The Tiger Woods Effect on THE WORLD'S STAGE.

Sportynation, remember how I suggested that the media and the PGA tour needs Tiger Woods more than he needs them? Tiger Woods just last week decided that he would return to the PGA Tour and his first tournament would be at "The place like no other (ala Jim Nantz)...The Masters and the Masters will yet again, be a place like no other.

The Masters is is one of the four major championships in professional golf. Scheduled for the first full week of April, it is the first of the majors to be played each year. Unlike the other major championships, the Masters is held each year at the same location, Augusta National Golf Club, a private golf club in the city of Augusta, Georgia, USA. The Masters was started by Clifford Roberts and Bobby Jones, who designed Augusta National with course architect Alister MacKenzie. The tournament is an official money event on the PGA Tour, the PGA European Tour, and the Japan Golf Tour. The field of players is smaller than those of the other major championships because it is an invitational event, entry being controlled by the Augusta National Golf Club.

The tournament has a number of traditions. A green jacket is awarded to the winner of each tournament, which must be returned to the clubhouse after a year. The Champions dinner, inaugurated by Ben Hogan, is held on the Tuesday before each tournament, and is only open to past champions and certain board members of the Augusta National Golf Club. Beginning in 1963, legendary golfers, usually past champions, have hit an honorary tee shot on the morning of the first round. Such golfers have included Sam Snead, Byron Nelson, and Arnold Palmer, who has hit the tee shot the last two years. Since 1960, a semi-social Par 3 Contest, on a par-3 course on Augusta National's grounds, has been played on the day before the first round of each Masters Tournament. (Tiger will 100%, 0%, ain't no way in the world be present for this par-3 event. I just laughed uncontrollably with the thought of this. Geez Louise!



Jack Nicklaus has won more Masters Tournaments than any other golfer, winning six times between 1963 and 1986. Other multiple winners include Arnold Palmer and Tiger Woods, with four each, and Phil Mickelson with two. Gary Player, from South Africa, was the first non-American player to win the tournament in 1961. The tournament organizers frequently extend the length and layout of the course to meet developments in equipment technology and player skill.

The understatement of the year is to say The Masters is one of the most prestigious tournaments in the world. Tiger's addition, adds to the intrigue and takes the spectacle to unfathomable levels...multidimensional levels.



There was a report the other day that stated that the Masters would be the most watched event in the United States this century since Obama's inauguration...even bigger than the Super Bowl, Mash, American Idol, and the Olympics.

The ticketing and monetary implications are ridiculous too.

Although tickets for the Masters are not expensive, they are very difficult to come by (pre-Tiger). Even the practice rounds can be difficult to get into. Applications for practice round tickets have to be made nearly a year in advance and the successful applicants are chosen by random ballot. Tickets to the actual tournament are sold only to members of a patrons list, which is closed. A waiting list for the patrons list was opened in 1972 and closed in 1978. It was reopened in 2000 and subsequently closed once again. In 2008, The Masters also began allowing children (between the ages of 8 and 16) to enter on tournament days for free if they are accompanied by the patron who is the owner of his or her badge.

Sportynation, tickets to the Masters are some of the toughest to get in all of sports. This year, that figures to intensify, with Tiger Woods' decision to make his return to golf at Augusta National.

Which means the best time to buy a ticket was probably a week ago.

According to online ticket marketplace StubHub!, here's what happened with their Masters sales the day after Woods' announcement.

* Total dollar volume sales were up more than five times the daily average.

* The average price for tickets purchased increased roughly 10%.

* Online page views for Masters tickets increased 70%, so clearly the market is active and fans are hunting.

Also, the aggregate average for all Masters tickets is hovering around $500, Stubhub! says. That gets the price back to 2008 levels. In 2009, with the economy so down, the aggregate average was $400.



Sportynation, Tiger Woods made this decision to return on March 16th and these stats were taken just the other day. The media attention, the scum, the filth, the salacious, the impractical, the manufactured outrage, and the ridiculous will be back ASAP.

Get ready. It's gonna be nuts. Happy March Madness and I guess April Madness. This is my Minority Report.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

“All good things must come to an end, but all bad things can continue forever.”

Life is an unanswered question, but let's still believe in the dignity and importance of that question. ~ Tennessee Williams

The ideal man bears the accidents of life with dignity and grace, making the best of circumstances. ~ Aristotle

Let us endeavour so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry. ~ Mark Twain

The spurns
That patient merit of the unworthy takes;
When he himself might his quietus make
With a bare bodkin. Who would fardels bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death—
The undiscovered country, from whose bourne
No traveler returns—puzzles the will,
And makes us rather bear those ills we have,
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Thus conscience does make cowards of us all,
And thus the native hue of resolution
Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought.
~ Shakespeare

Wait who died?!

Tiger Woods seemingly gave an über important eulogy on Friday last. This eulogy was covered by all of the major networks, pre-empted a plethora of AM and PM radio stations, reduced liquidity on Wall Street, drastically impacted the productivity of almost all corporations tremendously.

As I sat in my cube with the streaming video player open and no sound as the office got quieter and quieter as each moment passed, I plopped the sound on, put my headphones in the jack and listened to the somber moment.



HOWEVERRRRRRRR, as I listened I began to notice that no one infact died. I scratched my head furiously, then it dawned on me. A golfer was discussing/apologizing/revealing to the world his sexual (adulterous) dalliances.

This was one of the more revelatory moments of this decade for me. The level of obsession with Tiger Woods and particularly this "issue" is beyond ridiculous. This gossipy nightmare is being covered with more zeal and fervour than current real news stories such as health care, Haiti, the economy, unemployment, and the 2 wars in which our country is fighting. This was evident a couple months ago as Woods "graced" the cover of the NY Post 20+ times making it the longest-running fixture on the front page. The previous record was held by the 9/11 attacks.



Do we really care about this golfer that sells Buicks and razors that much? Or rather should we? Sportynation, if I asked you 4 months ago (gun to your head) is Tiger Woods, a billionaire athlete whose job demands that he travel all across the world...the whole wide world, faithful to his wife (gun to your head!) you would say what? Then, if I asked you is he sleeping with dozens of women, you'd say what? Mind you, you have a gun to your head. You'd probably say yes. After all, he is not a humanitarian. So why the outrage?

I don't think we as a society would be as outraged and entitled if a CEO of a major company or member of high society cheated on his her spouse (ironic that some might argue that consumers of the products that he endorses American Express, Accenture, Buick, and Titleist are a part of the demographic most likely to be unfaithful). In fact, we'd maybe expect it, we certainly would not be shocked. Tiger is almost no different from a CEO, he's rich, has a limitless amount of resources, is powerful, and is impactful. You could maybe argue though that Tiger represents himself. He plays an individual sport and is not a part of a team. I thought that we liked and loved Tiger Woods because he was and is maybe the best golfer ever? Is that a wrong assumption. Would we care if he weren't so good at golf? Nope.

The ugly, hateful, spiteful, entitled nature of society was put on full display Friday last. The pathetic simple-minded mob has perhaps finally gone too far. Taking an easy stance or joining in with the mob is not difficult, commendable, or noteworthy. In fact, it usually does not require thought and is lazy. Clearly, if Woods were single this wouldn't be happening or an issue....so he's apologizing to us for not honoring his marriage, his wife, and a moral code. Apologizing to us...



How are people ok castigating behavior that they themselves would partake! If placed in the same situation, what would you do? I'm willing to bet overwhelmingly similar behavior would occur. The infidelity statistics are staggering (http://www.menstuff.org/issues/byissue/infidelitystats.html).

As Chris Rock famously said,

You see all these fat Republican-like guys going:

"l would never do such a thing.
This is a travesty."

Rock is like, "Nobody's trying to [please] you."

Ain't no [whatever]-year-old girls
trying to [please] Orrin Hatch.

Ain't nobody trying
to give Newt Gingrich some.

l don't [care], you ain't never
gonna hear Newt Gingrich go:

"Man, l wish these [floozies]
would back up off me/"

"l wish they would just
back the [heck] up off me."



Almost everybody with a television in the world knows who Tiger Woods is, they know that he is married, they know that he is an athlete, they know that he is powerful, the know that he is one of the greatest ever at his craft, and they know that he is worth more than a billion dollars. I can't even begin to understand how often he is hit up for money and business opportunities. And, I certainly can't begin to understand how often people throw themselves at him. The stories of groupies are staggering. If high school basketball and college basketball players are kings, what is he?

This post is not in defense of Eldrick Woods' poor judgment and behavior, but rather it is trying to offer just a little perspective.

Let's not overlook that the media's unethical successful pursuit of ruining his life FURTHER for its own profit is taking place. That is to say, the more scandal and garbage is found on Tiger Woods, the more profits are made and the more we turn our heads to the absolute demolition of his personal life (We HAVE to ask his mother and his wife graphic often times sexual questions, we HAVE to follow his 2 year daughter and announce the address of her school, We HAVE to receive an apology).

The media is a for profit industry. It "reports" on "news" and opines early and often. Never mind, the implications of this "reporting." It simply no longer matters. The media is probably the most powerful thing in the U.S. and maybe the world (likely behind religion). It is more often than not unquestioned and the final say. Journalistic principles are thrown out the door. You or I could have made an allegation regarding Tiger when it was popular and there is a non insignificant chance that it would have gone viral. Opinions are made and solidified by the media in a matter of seconds. Many do not have enough time or energy to delve more into what is actually happening. Opinions of journalists pass as fact! The U.S. Constitution gives the press an almost limitless amount of power which undoubtedly is instantaneously abused. Just because they can use the power, does not make or mean that this power should be used to report on abhorrent behavior such as Tiger Woods cheating on his wife.

Perspective has officially been lost and we have expectations and expect behavior from others that we do not expect from and for ourselves. How would we feel if we made a mistake and then people were following our entire family including our toddler daughter around while also releasing there whereabouts, reporting facts, and etc. What if our darkest moments that only affect our loves ones are made public and were illuminated??

We are smack dab in a society full of jealousy and entitlement. We just want to see how far the successful can fall. We are in the business of profiting from the downfall of others.

Does the media want the story to go away?

Does Tiger need the media and golf or do the media and golf need Tiger Woods?

"Let he who is without sin, cast the first stone"

This is my Minority Report.



(Many of the insights were inspired by Miami 790 AM The ticket)

Monday, February 15, 2010

The blaming of the victims continues...




Today, the NY Daily News detailed an account and report that women are surprisingly less forgiving than men of rape victims. More than half of the women who participated in a new survey think certain rape victims should accept some responsibility for the violent attack they endured.

One third felt that provocative dress or returning to the attacker's house to have a drink makes a victim deserving of some blame for the rape, according to the survey, which was reported by BBC News.

The online survey of more than 1,000 people in London, called Wake Up To Rape, found that more than half of both men and women said that in some instances, the victim should take responsibility for a rape. The survey participants, who ranged in age from 18 to 50, included 712 men and 349 men, according to BBC News.

Some 71 percent of the women who said they felt some rape victims should take responsibility said the victims were accountable for the crime if they'd gone to bed with the attacker. Only 57 percent of the men felt that way, according to the survey.

Sportynation, victim blaming is nothing new, but is 100% something to fear. Victim blaming is holding the victims of a crime, an accident, or any type of abusive maltreatment to be entirely or partially responsible for the unfortunate incident that has occurred in their life.

Historically victim-blaming has often emerged in racist and sexist forms. It is also about blaming individuals for their personal distress or for social difficulties, rather than the other parties involved or the overarching social system in place.

Victim blaming serves as a diversion and/or rather a mechanism to make one feel good, better, safe, or safer. That is, the mentalities that that would never happen to me because I live in a nice neighborhood, I don't dress "suggestively/scantily clad" or that that would never happen to me because I'm smart, I have good parents, I raised my kids properly, or that I have superior talent.



Stated simply, we as humans look for reason any and everywhere...even when it is not there. In addition to that we seem to be naturally hard-wired and programed to not look at the situation in its most basic form. Instead we look at things that may not be "totally" true, correlated to the situation, or insignificantly related.

The rationalization or explanation of a tragic incident was on full display this weekend when Nodar Kumaritashvili, a 21-year-old slider from the republic of Georgia, died Friday after he crashed in the final curve. He was traveling at nearly 90 mph when he slammed into an unpadded steel support pole.

Officials also have modified the final curve where he crashed and erected a wooden wall over the steel beams. Within sight of the finish line, Nodar Kumaritashvili crashed coming out of the 16th turn and slammed into an unpadded steel pole while traveling nearly 90 mph. Despite frantic attempts by paramedics to save his life, he died at a trauma center.

Concerns about the lightning-fast course had been raised for months. There were worries that the $100 million-plus venue was too technically difficult, and a lack of significant practice time by everyone but the host nation’s sliders would result in a rash of accidents.

But the International Luge Federation and Vancouver Olympic officials said their investigation showed that the crash was the result of human error and that “there was no indication that the accident was caused by deficiencies in the track.”

In a joint statement they said Kumaritashvili was late coming out of the next-to-last turn and failed to compensate. “This resulted in a late entrance into curve 16 and although the athlete worked to correct the problem, he eventually lost control of the sled, resulting in the tragic accident.”

Men lugers, who were scheduled to finish training Friday morning, will get two extra practice runs Saturday. Women will train four hours later than scheduled. Men’s competition will be held later in the day as planned.

Mikhail Saakashvili, president of Georgia, who defended Kumaritashvili hours after officials blamed him. "No sports mistake is supposed to lead to a death,'' he said at a news conference.

"Nodar was a very rapidly progressing sportsman," Saakashvili said. "He won qualification on his own merits. He didn't come here because he represents some country. He came here because he had to compete. He had to go through ... international competitions. He was training all around Europe. You cannot say it was inexperience.''

Kumaritashvili’s inexperience may have played a factor in the crash, but he had qualified to compete. This would have been his first Olympics. He competed in five World Cup races this season, finishing 44th in the world standings. To claim he didn't have enough experience for a guy who is among the world's top 44 lugers is tremendously arrogant, infuriating, and pathetic (that was kind of strong, sportynation).



Sportynation, I am not going fall into the easy stance that this "sport" is too dangerous, too fast, brutal, and should be outlawed like it is often said each summer when a horse dies or is seriously injured in the Preakness, Breaders Cup, Belmont Stakes, Kentucky Derby, and etc. However, I will say a few things...First, there should be more precautions, more responsibility delved out to the individuals and groups in charge, and research done by outside independent entities. You can't ask the commissioner like figure or the group in charge to oversee the sport because of their biases and agendas and you certainly cannot have athletes police themselves because they are far too close to the sport and could and probably would make decisions that are in the extreme. After all, many lugers have complained about "starting from the women's start", "the track is too slow", and "is not as fun" (albeit after a fatality just two days ago), but you also have emotionally distraught athletes that are and will be damaged for a long long time and also a group of athletes that have already left the competition.

It does seem particularly irresponsible, unkind, unreasonable, insensitive, and disingenuous "as the body is still warm" to proclaim and insinuate that it was the luger's fault, and that there was nothing wrong with the course excccccceptttttt that we are going to raise the walls, change the ice, lower the start, and offer more practice time. Sportynation, does this not sound like the luge federation trying to cover itself?

Indeed, luge is a dangerous sport, but the fact that they changed things with the track clearly shows they know the track itself was dangerous, even though they deny that. One of the changes was to wrap all metal columns exposed to the track with cushions similar to how NASCAR and Indy Car safeguards the corners when the cars come around corners. Seems pretty simple and easy of a change or precaution. Right?

The opposite point of view argues that the luge federation is only making the changes for the psychological or emotional aspects. The changes are being made so that people (including athletes, press, coaches, families, and the general public) feel better or safer.

Sportynation, the father of the Georgian luger killed at the Vancouver Olympics said Monday his son worried the track was too dangerous, but insisted on competing because he had come to the games to try to win.

"He told me: I will either win or die," David Kumaritashvili told The Associated Press. "But that was youthful bravado, he couldn't be seriously talking about death."

The father, in an interview at his home in the snow-covered slopes of Georgia's top ski resort, said he had spoken to his son, Nodar, shortly before the fatal training run Friday.

"He told me: Dad, I really fear that curve," the elder Kumaritashvili said. "I'm a former athlete myself, and I told him: 'You just take a slower start.' But he responded: `Dad, what kind of thing you are teaching me? I have come to the Olympics to try to win.'"

Kumaritashvili, a Soviet-era luger himself, seemed to have mixed feelings about the cause of the crash.

"Maybe my son was at fault, but if the beams weren't there this wouldn't have happened, he would be alive," Kumaritashvili said. "This could have happened to anyone, anyone could have made that mistake. That's what I think."

Unfortunately, this young man tragically died.




Sportynation, I would like to reiterate that I'm not an authority on luge course design/engineering or luge techniques or etc., to me, luging is an exceptionally interesting sport. The point of this post his to point out that victim blaming is a serious thing that we must all be aware. Indeed, it may be human nature to blame the victim or search for reason in things that happen in the world, but we must not dismiss the obvious. We should think more and more while not over-thinking, give the benefit of the doubt more, and take things as they come.

This is my Minority Report.

Below is an account by Jay Mariotti a former writer for the Chicago Sun Times and Chicago Tribune and current writer for AOL Fanhouse. It is significantly stronger than my take and also very interesting.

__________________________________________________

WHISTLER, British Columbia -- Oh, sure, blame the accident on a dead man who can't defend himself. As if the tragedy on Blackcomb Mountain wasn't devastating enough to the Olympic movement, the legacy of the XXI Winter Games, Canada's dreams and a heartbroken family in the republic of Georgia, now we have to endure insensitive, clumsy finger-pointing from officials who won't accept a grave reality: They made the luge track too fast. Incredibly, they ruled Saturday that Nodar Kumaritashvili was a reckless driver who failed to compensate on his sled when he was late coming out of the next-to-last turn.

"There was no indication the accident was caused by deficiencies in the track,'' concluded the International Luge Federation, a motion seconded by Vancouver Olympic organizers. "This resulted in a late entrance into curve 16, and although the athlete worked to correct the problem, he eventually lost control of the sled, resulting in the tragic accident.''

It's a bogus explanation akin to posting a speed limit of 95 mph on an expressway, then blaming the driver for spinning out of control at, say, 95 mph. For months, serious concerns had been voiced that the track at Whistler Sliding Center was dangerous and vulnerable to a horrific event. Among the alarmed was none other than Josef Fendt, president of FIL, who said in November 2008 that racers were flying too fast on the course at 92.5 mph (149 kilometers) and urged that top speeds be reduced in the future to 85 mph (136 kilometers). "This is not in the interest of our International Luge Federation, and it makes me worry,'' Fendt said then -- in an FIL news release, no less. He also was critical of the Whistler track's designers, saying he didn't expect "such a leap'' in speeds.

Yet there was Fendt on the morning after in this stunned village, claiming that he never said such things. "We never said it is too fast. We are not saying this track is too fast, but that the track is fast,'' he said, using an interpreter because his English is lacking. "We did not expect those speeds, but after that, we found out that the track is safe for the athletes. We know all tracks are getting faster over time, and in planning future tracks, we have to make sure we don't go beyond 140 kilometers an hour. The speed of 137 here is an appropriate number.''

So why did Fendt, the most powerful man in the sport, watch idly as some racers hit 95 mph (153 kilometers) on practice runs this week? If he was so worried 15 months ago, why wasn't he mortified as several lugers were expressing fears, comparing themselves to "crash-test dummies'' who felt like their bodies were "on fire'' when they wrecked at high speeds? There had been more than a dozen crashes on the track during training before Kumaritashvili's 89-mph death ride. Where were the big bosses?



Asleep, that's where. Which is why they were so quick to cover their butts when a shocked world, sickened by the video of Kumaritashvili hurdling out of his sled and slamming grotesquely into an unpadded steel pole, is demanding answers that apparently aren't coming. If the luge federation and Vancouver officials did nothing wrong, riddle me this: Why were they compelled to reduce speeds by moving the start of the men's run further down the track to where the women start? Isn't that an admission of some sort, especially when speeds during the training run Saturday were significantly slower?

Nope. It's all Kumaritashvili's fault.

"Our technical officials studied the tape and walked the track. Based on this, they were able to render their opinion as to what happened,'' said Svein Romstad, FIL secretary general. "The run of Nodar appeared to be routine until curve 15. At that time, he came out late on the curve. This resulted into a late entrance into the final curve. Although he attempted to rectify the situation, he shot up into curve 16. The result is that he experienced a G-force that literally collapsed his body, rendering it difficult to control the sled, which in this case he was not able to do. Once this happened, he was literally at the mercy of the path of the sled.''

Because he was GOING TOO DAMNED FAST. How convenient of Romstad to omit that small detail.

All of which wasn't lost on Mikhail Saakashvili, president of Georgia, who defended Kumaritashvili hours after officials blamed him. "No sports mistake is supposed to lead to a death,'' he said at a news conference.

"Nodar was a very rapidly progressing sportsman," Saakashvili said. "He won qualification on his own merits. He didn't come here because he represents some country. He came here because he had to compete. He had to go through ... international competitions. He was training all around Europe. You cannot say it was inexperience.''

Then he thrust the dagger. "We were told by our sportsmen there was some suggestion that walls should have been higher there because there was eventuality of this happening," Saakashvili said.

Something reeks in the mountains, where a memorial to the fallen athlete -- candles, flowers, notes, a photo with the inscription "In Memory of Nodar Kumaritashvili, May he rest in peace." -- has been erected in the medals plaza. They should have shut down the luge competition for days, or canceled it entirely, after the first fatality at a Winter Games in 18 years. But only briefly was that option discussed, Romstad said. So there were the racers Saturday, resuming their craft even if it required sliding eerily into the same final turns where their colleague had perished. According to Fendt, not one luger expressed a desire to cancel the two-day event. You can call it steely dedication to one's passion.

I call it insanity.



"Everybody deals with these things different,'' said U.S. luger Tony Benshoof, among those who have wrecked this week. "I can't personally deal with it until after the Games.''

"It's a big hit to the luge community and the Olympic committee, but today is a new day,'' Canada's Samuel Edney said. "We are racing with Nodar in our minds. It's honorable that everybody got on their sleds today. It was a tough moment for sure, but there wasn't fear. I'm confident of the safety of the track.''

They should have been saved from themselves by their federation, the race director and the technical delegates. Instead, these daredevils continued competing on a death track where only minor changes were made. Yes, life goes on, but why so soon at the risk of more tragedy? Even with reduced speeds, the track remains the most dangerous in the world. A 12-foot-high wooden wall now covers the unpadded beams. The exit in the killer curve has been reshaped to "change the ice profile.'' And that's it, folks. Almost defiantly, they've done a minimum of work to the $105-million venue, convinced that this was "an extremely exceptional accident.'' Said Fendt: "For me personally, (Friday) was the worst day and saddest day in the history of the sport. We've been competing since 1964, almost 50 years, and it was the worst event that has happened. We had not had a fatal accident in 35 years on artificial tracks.''

Keep telling yourself that, sir, and you'll have another. The good news was that the racers, at least in the practice sessions, were going slower: None of the 36 sliders broke 90 mph. But conspicuous by his absence was Georgia's Levan Gureshidze, who didn't take his sixth practice run. When you think about it, who in his right mind would want to slide down the world's most dangerous track, face first, 24 hours after the grisliest scene they'd ever experienced? "It's really difficult to start,'' Slovenia's Domen Pociecha said. "Everybody's thinking the same thing. You can see it in their faces.''

"It eats you inside,'' Canada's Jeff Christie said. "It reminds you that it's a speed sport and that we take risks doing it. We're all racers; this is what we do. Our decision is to race.''



Adding to this exercise in denial was the organizers' stated reason for the subtle course alterations. They were made, Romstad said, more for emotional reasons than safety purposes. "We're trying our best to alleviate the traumatic components of this tragic event,'' he said, fighting back tears and sniffles. "The primary concern is the emotional aspect of it. We haven't experienced this in 35 years. We are unfamiliar with how to deal with this. In our discussions, it became clear that none of our athletes has experienced anything like this. They lost a friend yesterday, and it's emotional for everyone. Hopefully, psychologically, this will help. We believe this is the best course of action.''

Let's see. The man knows G-forces and psychology, but when it comes to the simple questions of why the track was too fast and why there were so many practice crashes, he draws a blank. "This is a fast sport,'' Romstad said, "and athletes do encounter problems on a regular basis. There was nothing out of the ordinary that signaled need for a change. There were no signs that were unique."

Nothing out of the ordinary? No signs that were unique? I'd say lugers going 95 mph, when Fendt strongly suggested not long ago that they shouldn't exceed 85 mph, is something out of the ordinary and unique. I'd call it a scandal, actually, and if the International Olympic Committee doesn't investigate, then president Jacques Rogge and his people should be investigated, too. "We certainly didn't hear anything about excessive speed,'' said Mark Adams, the IOC's communications director. "We're very, very confident it is safe.''

The lugers talked of high speeds all week. They were quoted in stories, interviewed on TV. Where was the IOC? Is it not apparent that a pall has been cast over the Games? "It's really unfortunate to have something like that happen," said U.S. snowboarding star Shaun White, who had his own ugly wreck last month. "We're all in different sports and from different countries, but when we get here, we're all part of the same family. It has definitely affected everyone here."

As a group, the lugers decided to wear a piece of black tape on the left side of their helmets. "He crashed on the left side of curve 16,'' France's Thomas Girod said, "so we are wearing tape on the left side of our helmets in his memory.''

Finally, somebody at the luge track did something smart.