Tiger Tiger Woods y'all!

From the Associated Press with my commentary to follow...

WINDERMERE, Fla. (AP)—Tiger Woods canceled yet another meeting with state troopers but, for the first time, talked about his car crash on his Web site, saying it was his fault, that his wife acted courageously and that remaining details were private.

The statement was posted about an hour before troopers were to meet with the world’s No. 1 golfer at his home inside the gates of Isleworth. A meeting was not rescheduled.

In a tape of a 911 call released Sunday, two days after the accident, a neighbor told dispatchers that a black Cadillac Escalade hit a tree and “I have someone down in front of my house.”

Woods’ neighbor never mentions the golfer by name, and the call is inaudible at several points because of the bad connection.

“I came out here just to see what was going on,” the neighbor, who was not identified, told dispatchers. “I see him, and he’s laying down.”

One woman is heard in the background yelling, “What happened?”

In his statement, Woods took responsibility for the accident.

“This situation is my fault, and it’s obviously embarrassing to my family and me,” Woods said. “I’m human and I’m not perfect. I will certainly make sure this doesn’t happen again.”

Woods said it was a private matter, and he wanted to keep it that way. What he failed to address was where he was going at that hour.

“Although I understand there is curiosity, the many false, unfounded and malicious rumors that are currently circulating about my family and me are irresponsible,” he said.

Windermere police chief Daniel Saylor has said Woods’ wife, Elin, used a golf club to smash out a rear window to help him get out of the SUV when she heard the crash from inside their home at 2:25 a.m. Friday.

“The only person responsible for the accident is me,” Woods said. “My wife, Elin, acted courageously when she saw I was hurt and in trouble. She was the first person to help me. Any other assertion is absolutely false.”




Sgt. Kim Montes of the Florida Highway Patrol said Woods’ attorney, Mark Nejame, informed the patrol that Woods would not be meeting with troopers Sunday afternoon.

“It has not been rescheduled,” Montes said. “He’s not required by law to give us a statement, and we’ll move forward with our investigation without it.”

Police first tried to interview Woods on Friday, only for his wife to ask if they could return the next day because he was sleeping.

As they headed to Woods’ $2.4 million house inside the gates of Isleworth on Saturday afternoon, FHP dispatch put through a phone call to troopers from Woods’ agent, informing them that Woods and his wife would be unavailable to talk until Sunday.

The accident came two days after the National Enquirer published a story alleging that Woods had been seeing a New York night club hostess, and that they recently were together in Melbourne, where Woods competed in the Australian Masters.

The woman, Rachel Uchitel, denied having an affair with Woods when contacted by The Associated Press.




Los Angeles attorney Gloria Allred confirmed she was representing Uchitel when she was reached by the AP on Sunday.

“She is with me in L.A.,” Allred said later in an e-mail to the AP. “We plan to meet and then we’ll decide on the next step, which we do not plan to announce to the press.”

Uchitel arrived at Los Angeles International Airport late Sunday morning, where she was met by Allred and escorted out of the baggage claim area and into a black car. Uchitel did not speak to reporters except to ask that she be left alone.

Woods is to host his Chevron World Challenge this week in Thousand Oaks, Calif., which benefits his foundation. Woods’ news conference had been scheduled for Tuesday afternoon, although it was not clear if he would still play, or even attend.

“We do not know if Tiger is playing; we are anticipating a great week of competition,” said Greg McLaughlin, the tournament director and president of his foundation.

Aside from occasional criticism of his temper inside the ropes, Woods has kept himself out of the news beyond his sport. In an October posting on his Facebook account, Woods wrote, “I’m asked why people don’t often see me and Elin in gossip magazines or tabloids. I think we’ve avoided a lot of media attention because we’re kind of boring. …”

“He’s an iconic brand, the platinum standard,” said John Rowady, president of rEvolution, a Chicago-based sports marketing agency. “I find it interesting how he’s being attacked by so many sides after how gracious he’s been. But even the best of celebrities who try to do their best can be riddled with controversy.”



AP Golf Writer Doug Ferguson in Jacksonville, AP Sports Writer Tim Dahlberg in Las Vegas and Associated Press writers Linda Deutsch in Los Angeles, Lisa Orkin Emmanuel and Sarah Larimer in Miami and Louise Nordstrom in Stockholm contributed to this report.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tiger Woods' remarks have been tremendously well though out, calculated, and wise. He has taken responsibility for the incident, has attempted to deflect attention away from his wife and family, and most importantly he has not said too much.

Famous people and/or people in the public eye far too often succumb to public pressures and sabotage themselves in a multitude of ways. That is to say that these noteworthy people make public statements against the advise of attorneys (see Jim Leyritz), make the media rounds (see Roger Clemens), write a lot on the personal websites, blogs, and social networking sites, and etc (see most anyone on Twitter and facebook).

The typical sports guy/gal or media member will tell you that Tiger must come clean. Tiger must speak up and do the "right" thing which is to tell all. Tiger owes this too his fans, the public, his sponsors, and the little children that look up to him. However, that position an d expectation is disingenuous and bordering on the asinine.



Sporty nation, Tiger Woods has a very very very small expectation of privacy. He is famous, he makes millions upon millions because of fans, the general public, the media, and etc. That being said, he doesn't truly owe any of these parties information about what is going on in his personal life or his arrests particularly because they are done in private and because they are not directly incongruous to an image that he is portraying. To further clarify, if Tiger Woods pulled an Eliot Spitzer and cracked down on crime and profited monetarily, politically, and socially then we have a serious serious issue that needs to be pointed called out, or if Tiger Woods a spokesman for PETA and was frequenting bull fights in Seville, then we have a relevant story because he is directly profiting from a blatant lie. What Tiger is alleged to have does not have to be told to the public.

(side note, how funny is Chris Berman endorsing Nutrisystem and Applebee's simultaneously on ESPN?)



In addition to the above, Tiger speaking to the public could and probably would be more damaging to his career, his sponsors, his family, the sport of golf, and his image. Tiger does not benefit from speaking to the police, holding a press conference, and/or "telling all." Is it not exceptionally unrealistic for people to expect Tiger Woods to air his personal life and alleged dirty laundry out to the public because the public wants to know. After all, let's not forget that the media benefits from the downfall of athletes and famous people and instututions. (See Perez Hilton and TMZ as well at The Duke Lacrosse scandal, the downfall of Barry Bonds, Alex Rodriguez, Allen Iverson, and Terrel Owens to name a few).

Dan Le Batard, probably my favorite sports columnist ever and certainly my favorite sports personality of all time said, "Why would and should Tiger talk to police if law doesn't demand it and anything he tells them will be purchased anonymously by TMZ?" The answer is...he shouldn't.

Sportynation, Tiger Woods doesn't owe us anything and we are kidding ourselves with expectations that are far beyond what we would expect from ourselves. Would you announce to the co workers and etc. what happened in your personal life this past weekend or one of your lower points of your life? Probably not. And finally, there is no true ethical dilemma at play here.

As I told my cousin Vinny, we have absolutely NO idea what goes on in these individual's lives (even though we too often think we do) and nor should we know what going on in these individuals lives.

This is my Minority Report.